lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 2/2] drm/bridge: anx7625: Add anx7625 MIPI DSI/DPI to DP bridge driver
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:05:08PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:12:04PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 2:51 PM Xin Ji <xji@analogixsemi.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:55:15PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Just commenting on the mode_fixup function that was added in v7.
> > > >
> > > [snip]
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * once illegal timing detected, use default HFP, HSYNC, HBP
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + if (hblanking < HBLANKING_MIN || (hfp < HP_MIN && hbp < HP_MIN)) {
> > > >
> > > > should this be adj_hblanking/adj_hfp/adj_hbp?
> > > NO, need check original HFP and HBP, if they are not legal, driver need
> > > set default value to adj_hsync, adj_hfp, adj_hbp.
> > > >
> > > > > + adj_hsync = SYNC_LEN_DEF;
> > > > > + adj_hfp = HFP_HBP_DEF;
> > > > > + adj_hbp = HFP_HBP_DEF;
> > > > > + vref = adj->clock * 1000 / (adj->htotal * adj->vtotal);
> > > > > + if (hblanking < HBLANKING_MIN) {
> > > > > + delta_adj = HBLANKING_MIN - hblanking;
> > > > > + adj_clock = vref * delta_adj * adj->vtotal;
> > > > > + adj->clock += DIV_ROUND_UP(adj_clock, 1000);
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + delta_adj = hblanking - HBLANKING_MIN;
> > > > > + adj_clock = vref * delta_adj * adj->vtotal;
> > > > > + adj->clock -= DIV_ROUND_UP(adj_clock, 1000);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + DRM_WARN("illegal hblanking timing, use default.\n");
> > > > > + DRM_WARN("hfp(%d),hbp(%d),hsync(%d).\n", hfp, hbp, hsync);
> > > >
> > > > How likely is it that this mode is going to work? Can you just return
> > > > false here to reject the mode?
> > > We want to set the default minimal Hblancking value, then it may display,
> > > otherwise. If we just return false, there is no display for sure.
> >
> > Right, understand your argument. I'm pondering if it's not just better
> > to reject the mode rather than trying a timing that is definitely
> > quite different from what the monitor was asking for. No super strong
> > opinion, I'll let other people on the list weigh in.
>
> Yeah mode_fixup is supposed to be used to adjust the mode in intermediate
> stages (e.g. if you go from progressive to interlaced only at the end of
> your pipeline or something like that). It's not meant for adjusting the
> mode yout actually put out through a hdmi or dp connector. For fixed
> panels adjusting modes to fit the panel is also fairly common, but not for
> external outputs.
>
> Since this is a DP bridge I'd say no adjusting, just reject what doesn't
> fit.
We have found some panel which HBP less than 8, if we reject to adjust
video timing, then there is no display. The customer does not accept it,
they push us to fix it, the only resolve way is to adjust timing.
> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-30 05:36    [W:2.276 / U:0.592 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site