lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] tty: serial: bcm63xx: fix missing clk_put() in bcm63xx_uart
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:29:58AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 4/26/2020 11:19 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 21. 04. 20, 14:31, Zou Wei wrote:
> >> This patch fixes below error reported by coccicheck
> >>
> >> drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c:848:2-8: ERROR: missing clk_put;
> >> clk_get on line 842 and execution via conditional on line 846
> >>
> >> Fixes: ab4382d27412 ("tty: move drivers/serial/ to drivers/tty/serial/")
> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c | 4 +++-
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
> >> index 5674da2..ed0aa5c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c
> >> @@ -843,8 +843,10 @@ static int bcm_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> if (IS_ERR(clk) && pdev->dev.of_node)
> >> clk = of_clk_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> >>
> >> - if (IS_ERR(clk))
> >> + if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
> >> + clk_put(clk);
> >
> > Why would you want to put an erroneous clk?
>
> Doh, somehow I completely missed, you are right this does not look legit.

Ugh, can you send a revert for this please?

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-28 13:19    [W:0.076 / U:1.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site