Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Apr 2020 11:00:55 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] spi: lantiq: Synchronize interrupt handlers and transfers |
| |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:39:06PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:
> Do you suggest to use different ISRs for multiple interrupt lines and single > ISR for single interrupt line? I see, this results in writing repetitive > code lines.
It looks like the shared case is mainly a handler that calls the two other handlers?
> Does single ISR looks erroneous! Please let me know.
The change was not entirely clear, I was having trouble convincing myself that all the transformations were OK partly because I kept on finding little extra changes in there and partly because there were several things going on. In theory it could work. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |