lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] spi: lantiq: Synchronize interrupt handlers and transfers
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 01:39:06PM +0800, Dilip Kota wrote:

> Do you suggest to use different ISRs for multiple interrupt lines and single
> ISR for single interrupt line? I see, this results in writing repetitive
> code lines.

It looks like the shared case is mainly a handler that calls the two
other handlers?

> Does single ISR looks erroneous! Please let me know.

The change was not entirely clear, I was having trouble convincing
myself that all the transformations were OK partly because I kept on
finding little extra changes in there and partly because there were
several things going on. In theory it could work.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-28 12:01    [W:0.064 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site