lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/7] x86/mmu: Allocate/free PASID
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 04:55:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> writes:
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ typedef struct {
> > u16 pkey_allocation_map; s16 execute_only_pkey;
> > #endif
> > + +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM + int pasid;
>
> int? It's a value which gets programmed into the MSR along with the valid
> bit (bit 31) set.

The pasid is defined as "int" in struct intel_svm and in
intel_svm_bind_mm() and intel_svm_unbind_mm(). So the pasid defined in this
patch follows the same type defined in those places.

But as you pointed out below, ioasid_t is defined as "unsigned int".

>
> > extern void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> > index d7f2a5358900..da718a49e91e 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c @@ -226,6 +226,45 @@ static
> > LIST_HEAD(global_svm_list);
> > list_for_each_entry((sdev), &(svm)->devs, list) \
> > if ((d) != (sdev)->dev) {} else
> >
> > +/* + * If this mm already has a PASID we can use it. Otherwise
> > allocate a new one. + * Let the caller know if we did an allocation via
> > 'new_pasid'. + */ +static int alloc_pasid(struct intel_svm *svm, struct
> > mm_struct *mm, + int pasid_max, bool *new_pasid, int flags)
>
> Again, data types please. flags are generally unsigned and not plain int.
> Also pasid_max is certainly not plain int either.

The caller defines pasid_max and flags as "int". This function just follows
the caller's definitions.

But I will change their definitions to "unsigned int" here.

>
> > + *new_pasid = false; + + return mm->context.pasid; + } + + /* + *
> > Allocate a new pasid. Do not use PASID 0, reserved for RID to + *
> > PASID. + */ + pasid = ioasid_alloc(NULL, PASID_MIN, pasid_max - 1,
> > svm);
>
> ioasid_alloc() uses ioasid_t which is
>
> typedef unsigned int ioasid_t;
>
> Can we please have consistent types and behaviour all over the place?

Should I just define "pasid", "pasid_max", "flags" as "unsigned int" for
the new functions/code?

Or should I also change their types to "unsigned int" in the original
svm code (struct intel_svm, ...bind_mm(), etc)? I'm afraid that will be
a lot of changes and should be in a separate preparation patch.

Thanks.

-Fenghua

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-28 00:19    [W:0.150 / U:3.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site