lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] rtw88: Use udelay instead of usleep in atomic context
From
Date


> On Apr 23, 2020, at 14:49, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> writes:
>
>> It's incorrect to use usleep in atomic context.
>>
>> Switch to a macro which uses udelay instead of usleep to prevent the issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
>
> This fixes a regression, right? So there should be a Fixes line.

Yes, but the regression commit isn't in Linus' tree, so the sha1 may change.

Kai-Heng

>
> Also I can't take this until patch 1 is in my tree. And I don't know who
> takes iopoll.h patches.
>
> --
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-23 08:55    [W:1.196 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site