lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 11/11] perf test: add expr test for pmu metrics
From
Date
On 23/04/2020 15:22, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:29 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 03:04:30PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>>> +
>>> +static int pmu_tests(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pmu_events_map *map;
>>> + struct pmu_event *pe;
>>> + int i, j, k;
>>> + const char **ids;
>>> + int idnum;
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> + struct expr_parse_ctx ctx;
>>> + double result;
>>> +
>>> + i = 0;
>>> + for (;;) {
>>> + map = &pmu_events_map[i++];
>>> + if (!map->table) {
>>> + map = NULL;
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + j = 0;
>>> + for (;;) {
>>> + pe = &map->table[j++];
>>> + if (!pe->name && !pe->metric_group && !pe->metric_name)
>>> + break;
>>> + if (!pe->metric_expr)
>>> + continue;
>>
>> so we go throught all the metrics for the current cpu
>> and test the parsing on them.. great!
>
> It's not just the current CPU (such as skylake) it is every map
> (skylake, cascade lake, etc), but this only works for the architecture
> that jevents built.
> If jevents built all architectures then this could check them as well.
> Perhaps there should be a jevents test suite, but I think even then
> this test has value.

note: there is test__pmu_events(), which verifies that some test events
generated in pmu-events.c are as expected, and also verifies that we
create PMU events aliases as expected (for those test events). Nothing
is done for metrics, ATM.

Thanks,
John

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-23 17:12    [W:0.054 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site