lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 07/13] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 04:32:28PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
>
>
> On 4/14/20 6:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:59:57PM +0000, vpillai wrote:
> >> +static struct task_struct *
> >> +pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> >> +{
> >> + struct task_struct *next, *max = NULL;
> >> + const struct sched_class *class;
> >> + const struct cpumask *smt_mask;
> >> + int i, j, cpu;
> >> + bool need_sync = false;
> >
> > AFAICT that assignment is superfluous. Also, you violated the inverse
> > x-mas tree.
> >
> >> +
> >> + cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> >> + if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
> >> + return idle_sched_class.pick_next_task(rq);
> >
> > Are we actually hitting this one?
> >
>
> I did hit this race when I was testing taking cpu offline and online,
> which prompted the check of cpu being offline.

This is the schedule from the stop task to the idle task I presume,
there should really not be any other. And at that point the rq had
better be empty, so why didn't the normal task selection work?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-17 12:58    [W:0.077 / U:14.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site