lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm64: add the time namespace support
From
Date
Hi Andrei,

On 4/15/20 5:14 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 2:02 AM Vincenzo Frascino
> <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> On 4/11/20 8:33 AM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:23 AM Vincenzo Frascino
>>> <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have though a question on something I encountered during the testing of the
>>>> patches: I noticed that all the tests related to CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM fail on
>>>> arm64 (please find the results below the scissors). Is this expected?
>>>
>>> static int alarm_clock_get_timespec(clockid_t which_clock, struct
>>> timespec64 *tp)
>>> {
>>> struct alarm_base *base = &alarm_bases[clock2alarm(which_clock)];
>>>
>>> if (!alarmtimer_get_rtcdev())
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> It is probably that you get EINVAL from here ^^^. I will send a
>>> separate patch to handle this case in tests properly.
>>>
>>
>> This makes sense :) Please let me know when you post the fix so I can test it again.
>
> I have sent this fix: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/15/72
>

That's good, I will try it by the end of this week or beginning of next and let
you know the results.

>>
>> Are you planning as well to rebase this set?>
> What is the right tree to rebase on?
>

I guess master, I was asking because it would make easier my testing :)

> Thanks,
> Andrei
>

--
Regards,
Vincenzo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-15 18:36    [W:0.054 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site