[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> > I'll rely on Christoph to determine whether it makes sense to add some
> > periodic scavening of the atomic pools, whether that's needed for this to
> > be merged, or wheter we should enforce some maximum pool size.
> I don't really see the point. In fact the only part of the series
> I feel uneasy about is the growing of the pools, because it already
> adds a fair amount of complexity that we might not need for simple
> things, but shrinking really doesn't make any sense. So I'm tempted
> to not ever support shrinking, and even make growing optional code under
> a new config variable. We'll also need a way to query the current size
> through e.g. a debugfs file.

New debugfs file sounds good, I'll add it. If we want to disable dynamic
expansion when the pool is depleted under a new config option, let me

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-14 21:32    [W:0.068 / U:2.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site