Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64/cpufeature: Drop TraceFilt feature exposure from ID_DFR0 register | From | Anshuman Khandual <> | Date | Mon, 13 Apr 2020 09:09:52 +0530 |
| |
On 04/09/2020 06:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:19:21PM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >> On 01/28/2020 12:39 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> ID_DFR0 based TraceFilt feature should not be exposed. >> >> ... to guests. >> >> Hence lets drop it. >> >> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> > > Hmm, doesn't dropping cause it to become NONSTRICT? In general, I'd prefer > that we list all fields in these tables, rather than have implicit behaviour > in their absence.
Just trying to understand, so we should just leave it unchanged.
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, 28, 4, 0)
> > Will >
| |