Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: usb: gadget: fsl: Fix a wrong judgment in fsl_udc_probe() | From | Markus Elfring <> | Date | Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:30:11 +0200 |
| |
> Hardware experiments show that the negative return value is not just "-EPROBE_DEFER".
How much will this specific error code influence our understanding of the discussed software situation?
>>> + ret = udc_controller->irq ? : -ENODEV; >> Will it be clearer to specify values for all cases in such a conditional operator >> (instead of leaving one case empty)? > > I don't know what you mean of "instead of leaving one case empty".
I suggest to reconsider also the proposed specification “… ? : …”.
Regards, Markus
| |