lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm, dump_page(): do not crash with invalid mapping pointer
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 06:54:54PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> We have seen a following problem on a RPi4 with 1G RAM:
>
> BUG: Bad page state in process systemd-hwdb pfn:35601
> page:ffff7e0000d58040 refcount:15 mapcount:131221 mapping:efd8fe765bc80080 index:0x1 compound_mapcount: -32767
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address efd8fe765bc80080
> Mem abort info:
> ESR = 0x96000004
> Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> SET = 0, FnV = 0
> EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> Data abort info:
> ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004
> CM = 0, WnR = 0
> [efd8fe765bc80080] address between user and kernel address ranges
> Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in: btrfs libcrc32c xor xor_neon zlib_deflate raid6_pq mmc_block xhci_pci xhci_hcd usbcore sdhci_iproc sdhci_pltfm sdhci mmc_core clk_raspberrypi gpio_raspberrypi_exp pcie_brcmstb bcm2835_dma gpio_regulator phy_generic fixed sg scsi_mod efivarfs
> Supported: No, Unreleased kernel
> CPU: 3 PID: 408 Comm: systemd-hwdb Not tainted 5.3.18-8-default #1 SLE15-SP2 (unreleased)
> Hardware name: raspberrypi rpi/rpi, BIOS 2020.01 02/21/2020
> pstate: 40000085 (nZcv daIf -PAN -UAO)
> pc : __dump_page+0x268/0x368
> lr : __dump_page+0xc4/0x368
> sp : ffff000012563860
> x29: ffff000012563860 x28: ffff80003ddc4300
> x27: 0000000000000010 x26: 000000000000003f
> x25: ffff7e0000d58040 x24: 000000000000000f
> x23: efd8fe765bc80080 x22: 0000000000020095
> x21: efd8fe765bc80080 x20: ffff000010ede8b0
> x19: ffff7e0000d58040 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 0000000000000007
> x15: ffff000011689708 x14: 3030386362353637
> x13: 6566386466653a67 x12: 6e697070616d2031
> x11: 32323133313a746e x10: 756f6370616d2035
> x9 : ffff00001168a840 x8 : ffff00001077a670
> x7 : 000000000000013d x6 : ffff0000118a43b5
> x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : ffff80003dd9e2c8
> x3 : ffff80003dd9e2c8 x2 : 911c8d7c2f483500
> x1 : dead000000000100 x0 : efd8fe765bc80080
> Call trace:
> __dump_page+0x268/0x368
> bad_page+0xd4/0x168
> check_new_page_bad+0x80/0xb8
> rmqueue_bulk.constprop.26+0x4d8/0x788
> get_page_from_freelist+0x4d4/0x1228
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x134/0xe48
> alloc_pages_vma+0x198/0x1c0
> do_anonymous_page+0x1a4/0x4d8
> __handle_mm_fault+0x4e8/0x560
> handle_mm_fault+0x104/0x1e0
> do_page_fault+0x1e8/0x4c0
> do_translation_fault+0xb0/0xc0
> do_mem_abort+0x50/0xb0
> el0_da+0x24/0x28
> Code: f9401025 8b8018a0 9a851005 17ffffca (f94002a0)
> ---[ end trace 703ac54becfd8094 ]---
>
> Besides the underlying issue with page->mapping containing a bogus value for
> some reason, we can see that __dump_page() crashed by trying to read the
> pointer at mapping->host, turning a recoverable warning into full Oops.
>
> It can be expected that when page is reported as bad state for some reason, the
> pointers there should not be trusted blindly. So this patch treats all data in
> __dump_page() that depends on page->mapping as lava, using
> probe_kernel_read_strict(). Ideally this would include the dentry->d_parent
> recursively, but that would mean changing printk handler for %pd. Chances of
> reaching the dentry printing part with an initially bogus mapping pointer
> should be rather low, though.
>
> Also prefix printing mapping->a_ops with a description of what is being
> printed. In case the value is bogus, %ps will print raw value instead of
> the symbol name and then it's not obvious at all that it's printing a_ops.
>
> Reported-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> ---
> mm/debug.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

I'm not sure it worth the effort. It looks way too complex for what it
does.

I also expect it to slowdown dump_page(), which is hotpath for some debug
scenarios :P

Maybe just move printing this info to the end, so we would see the rest
even if ->mapping is bogus?

--
Kirill A. Shutemov

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-01 16:06    [W:0.060 / U:1.868 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site