Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: x86: CPUID emulation and tracing fixes | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Fri, 6 Mar 2020 09:45:26 +0100 |
| |
On 05/03/20 18:12, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> In theory, everything up to the refactoring is non-controversial, i.e. we >>> can bikeshed the refactoring without delaying the bug fixes. >> Even the refactoring itself is much less controversial. I queued >> everything, there's always time to unqueue. > Looks like the build-time assertions don't play nice with older versions of > gcc :-(
Yes, I was quite surprised that they worked. I suppose you could write a macro that checks against 'G', 'e', 'n', 'u', 'i', 'n', 'e', 'I', 'n', 't', 'e', 'l'...
Paolo
| |