lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] sched: fix the nonsense shares when load of cfs_rq is too, small
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 10:52, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 09:47:34AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > you will add +1 of nice prio for each device
> >
> > should we use instead
> > # define scale_load_down(w) ((w >> SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT) ? (w >>
> > SCHED_FIXEDPOINT_SHIFT) : MIN_SHARES)
>
> That's '((w >> SHIFT) ?: MIN_SHARES)', but even that is not quite right.
>
> I think we want something like:
>
> #define scale_load_down(w) \
> ({ unsigned long ___w = (w); \
> if (___w) \
> ____w = max(MIN_SHARES, ___w >> SHIFT); \
> ___w; })
>
> That is, we very much want to retain 0 I'm thinking.

yes, you're right

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-04 12:55    [W:0.078 / U:9.700 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site