lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 12/34] rcu-tasks: Further refactor RCU-tasks to allow adding more variants
Date
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

This commit refactors RCU tasks to allow variants to be added. These
variants will share the current Tasks-RCU tasklist scan and the holdout
list processing.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 9ca83c6..344426e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@

struct rcu_tasks;
typedef void (*rcu_tasks_gp_func_t)(struct rcu_tasks *rtp);
+typedef void (*pregp_func_t)(void);
+typedef void (*pertask_func_t)(struct task_struct *t, struct list_head *hop);
+typedef void (*postscan_func_t)(void);
+typedef void (*holdouts_func_t)(struct list_head *hop, bool ndrpt, bool *frptp);
+typedef void (*postgp_func_t)(void);

/**
* Definition for a Tasks-RCU-like mechanism.
@@ -21,6 +26,11 @@ typedef void (*rcu_tasks_gp_func_t)(struct rcu_tasks *rtp);
* @cbs_lock: Lock protecting callback list.
* @kthread_ptr: This flavor's grace-period/callback-invocation kthread.
* @gp_func: This flavor's grace-period-wait function.
+ * @pregp_func: This flavor's pre-grace-period function (optional).
+ * @pertask_func: This flavor's per-task scan function (optional).
+ * @postscan_func: This flavor's post-task scan function (optional).
+ * @holdout_func: This flavor's holdout-list scan function (optional).
+ * @postgp_func: This flavor's post-grace-period function (optional).
* @call_func: This flavor's call_rcu()-equivalent function.
* @name: This flavor's textual name.
* @kname: This flavor's kthread name.
@@ -32,6 +42,11 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
raw_spinlock_t cbs_lock;
struct task_struct *kthread_ptr;
rcu_tasks_gp_func_t gp_func;
+ pregp_func_t pregp_func;
+ pertask_func_t pertask_func;
+ postscan_func_t postscan_func;
+ holdouts_func_t holdouts_func;
+ postgp_func_t postgp_func;
call_rcu_func_t call_func;
char *name;
char *kname;
@@ -113,6 +128,7 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_tasks_kthread(void *arg)

/* Pick up any new callbacks. */
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtp->cbs_lock, flags);
+ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); // Order updates vs. GP.
list = rtp->cbs_head;
rtp->cbs_head = NULL;
rtp->cbs_tail = &rtp->cbs_head;
@@ -207,6 +223,49 @@ static void __init rcu_tasks_bootup_oddness(void)
// rates from multiple CPUs. If this is required, per-CPU callback lists
// will be needed.

+/* Pre-grace-period preparation. */
+static void rcu_tasks_pregp_step(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Wait for all pre-existing t->on_rq and t->nvcsw transitions
+ * to complete. Invoking synchronize_rcu() suffices because all
+ * these transitions occur with interrupts disabled. Without this
+ * synchronize_rcu(), a read-side critical section that started
+ * before the grace period might be incorrectly seen as having
+ * started after the grace period.
+ *
+ * This synchronize_rcu() also dispenses with the need for a
+ * memory barrier on the first store to t->rcu_tasks_holdout,
+ * as it forces the store to happen after the beginning of the
+ * grace period.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+}
+
+/* Per-task initial processing. */
+static void rcu_tasks_pertask(struct task_struct *t, struct list_head *hop)
+{
+ if (t != current && READ_ONCE(t->on_rq) && !is_idle_task(t)) {
+ get_task_struct(t);
+ t->rcu_tasks_nvcsw = READ_ONCE(t->nvcsw);
+ WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout, true);
+ list_add(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list, hop);
+ }
+}
+
+/* Processing between scanning taskslist and draining the holdout list. */
+void rcu_tasks_postscan(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Wait for tasks that are in the process of exiting. This
+ * does only part of the job, ensuring that all tasks that were
+ * previously exiting reach the point where they have disabled
+ * preemption, allowing the later synchronize_rcu() to finish
+ * the job.
+ */
+ synchronize_srcu(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu);
+}
+
/* See if tasks are still holding out, complain if so. */
static void check_holdout_task(struct task_struct *t,
bool needreport, bool *firstreport)
@@ -239,55 +298,63 @@ static void check_holdout_task(struct task_struct *t,
sched_show_task(t);
}

+/* Scan the holdout lists for tasks no longer holding out. */
+static void check_all_holdout_tasks(struct list_head *hop,
+ bool needreport, bool *firstreport)
+{
+ struct task_struct *t, *t1;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(t, t1, hop, rcu_tasks_holdout_list) {
+ check_holdout_task(t, needreport, firstreport);
+ cond_resched();
+ }
+}
+
+/* Finish off the Tasks-RCU grace period. */
+static void rcu_tasks_postgp(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * Because ->on_rq and ->nvcsw are not guaranteed to have a full
+ * memory barriers prior to them in the schedule() path, memory
+ * reordering on other CPUs could cause their RCU-tasks read-side
+ * critical sections to extend past the end of the grace period.
+ * However, because these ->nvcsw updates are carried out with
+ * interrupts disabled, we can use synchronize_rcu() to force the
+ * needed ordering on all such CPUs.
+ *
+ * This synchronize_rcu() also confines all ->rcu_tasks_holdout
+ * accesses to be within the grace period, avoiding the need for
+ * memory barriers for ->rcu_tasks_holdout accesses.
+ *
+ * In addition, this synchronize_rcu() waits for exiting tasks
+ * to complete their final preempt_disable() region of execution,
+ * cleaning up after the synchronize_srcu() above.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+}
+
/* Wait for one RCU-tasks grace period. */
static void rcu_tasks_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
{
struct task_struct *g, *t;
unsigned long lastreport;
- LIST_HEAD(rcu_tasks_holdouts);
+ LIST_HEAD(holdouts);
int fract;

- /*
- * Wait for all pre-existing t->on_rq and t->nvcsw transitions
- * to complete. Invoking synchronize_rcu() suffices because all
- * these transitions occur with interrupts disabled. Without this
- * synchronize_rcu(), a read-side critical section that started
- * before the grace period might be incorrectly seen as having
- * started after the grace period.
- *
- * This synchronize_rcu() also dispenses with the need for a
- * memory barrier on the first store to t->rcu_tasks_holdout,
- * as it forces the store to happen after the beginning of the
- * grace period.
- */
- synchronize_rcu();
+ rtp->pregp_func();

/*
* There were callbacks, so we need to wait for an RCU-tasks
* grace period. Start off by scanning the task list for tasks
* that are not already voluntarily blocked. Mark these tasks
- * and make a list of them in rcu_tasks_holdouts.
+ * and make a list of them in holdouts.
*/
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process_thread(g, t) {
- if (t != current && READ_ONCE(t->on_rq) && !is_idle_task(t)) {
- get_task_struct(t);
- t->rcu_tasks_nvcsw = READ_ONCE(t->nvcsw);
- WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_tasks_holdout, true);
- list_add(&t->rcu_tasks_holdout_list,
- &rcu_tasks_holdouts);
- }
- }
+ for_each_process_thread(g, t)
+ rtp->pertask_func(t, &holdouts);
rcu_read_unlock();

- /*
- * Wait for tasks that are in the process of exiting. This
- * does only part of the job, ensuring that all tasks that were
- * previously exiting reach the point where they have disabled
- * preemption, allowing the later synchronize_rcu() to finish
- * the job.
- */
- synchronize_srcu(&tasks_rcu_exit_srcu);
+ rtp->postscan_func();

/*
* Each pass through the following loop scans the list of holdout
@@ -303,9 +370,8 @@ static void rcu_tasks_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
bool firstreport;
bool needreport;
int rtst;
- struct task_struct *t1;

- if (list_empty(&rcu_tasks_holdouts))
+ if (list_empty(&holdouts))
break;

/* Slowly back off waiting for holdouts */
@@ -320,31 +386,10 @@ static void rcu_tasks_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
lastreport = jiffies;
firstreport = true;
WARN_ON(signal_pending(current));
- list_for_each_entry_safe(t, t1, &rcu_tasks_holdouts,
- rcu_tasks_holdout_list) {
- check_holdout_task(t, needreport, &firstreport);
- cond_resched();
- }
+ rtp->holdouts_func(&holdouts, needreport, &firstreport);
}

- /*
- * Because ->on_rq and ->nvcsw are not guaranteed to have a full
- * memory barriers prior to them in the schedule() path, memory
- * reordering on other CPUs could cause their RCU-tasks read-side
- * critical sections to extend past the end of the grace period.
- * However, because these ->nvcsw updates are carried out with
- * interrupts disabled, we can use synchronize_rcu() to force the
- * needed ordering on all such CPUs.
- *
- * This synchronize_rcu() also confines all ->rcu_tasks_holdout
- * accesses to be within the grace period, avoiding the need for
- * memory barriers for ->rcu_tasks_holdout accesses.
- *
- * In addition, this synchronize_rcu() waits for exiting tasks
- * to complete their final preempt_disable() region of execution,
- * cleaning up after the synchronize_srcu() above.
- */
- synchronize_rcu();
+ rtp->postgp_func();
}

void call_rcu_tasks(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func);
@@ -413,6 +458,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier_tasks);

static int __init rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread(void)
{
+ rcu_tasks.pregp_func = rcu_tasks_pregp_step;
+ rcu_tasks.pertask_func = rcu_tasks_pertask;
+ rcu_tasks.postscan_func = rcu_tasks_postscan;
+ rcu_tasks.holdouts_func = check_all_holdout_tasks;
+ rcu_tasks.postgp_func = rcu_tasks_postgp;
rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread_generic(&rcu_tasks);
return 0;
}
--
2.9.5
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-27 23:42    [W:0.295 / U:2.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site