lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [v2 2/3] media: ov8856: Add devicetree support
Hi Robert,

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:32:29AM +0100, Robert Foss wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 15:47, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:56:37PM +0100, Robert Foss wrote:
> > ...
> > > > > +static int __ov8856_power_on(struct ov8856 *ov8856)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&ov8856->sd);
> > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(ov8856->xvclk);
> > > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable xvclk\n");
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->reset_gpio, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(ov8856_supply_names),
> > > > > + ov8856->supplies);
> > > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to enable regulators\n");
> > > > > + goto disable_clk;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ov8856->reset_gpio, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + usleep_range(1500, 1800);
> > > >
> > > > I think you could omit the delay on ACPI based systems. Or just bail out
> > > > early in that case.
> > >
> > > I'll add a check for reset_gpio being NULL, and skip the sleep for that case.
> >
> > There could also be a regulator but no GPIO.
> >
> > I think if you don't have either, then certainly there's no need for a
> > delay.
>
> Removing the delay if no action is taken makes sense, but I'm not sure
> how best to do it.
> If there are no regulators dummy ones are created automatically, which
> makes distinguishing between a little bit cumbersome. The regulator
> structs could of course all be inspected, and if all are dummy ones,
> the delay could be skipped. But is there a neater way of doing this?
> Manually inspecting the regs strikes me as a bit inelegant.

I guess the cleanest, easy way to make this right, albeit slightly
unoptimal in very rare cases where you have none of the above resources in
a DT system, is to bail out if you're running on an ACPI based system.

I.e. checking for e.g. is_acpi_node(dev->fwnode).

--
Sakari Ailus

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-27 14:38    [W:0.072 / U:8.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site