lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] swiotlb: Allow swiotlb to live at pre-defined address
From
Date


On 26.03.20 18:05, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 05:29:22PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> The swiotlb is a very convenient fallback mechanism for bounce buffering of
>> DMAable data. It is usually used for the compatibility case where devices
>> can only DMA to a "low region".
>>
>> However, in some scenarios this "low region" may be bound even more
>> heavily. For example, there are embedded system where only an SRAM region
>> is shared between device and CPU. There are also heterogeneous computing
>> scenarios where only a subset of RAM is cache coherent between the
>> components of the system. There are partitioning hypervisors, where
>> a "control VM" that implements device emulation has limited view into a
>> partition's memory for DMA capabilities due to safety concerns.
>>
>> This patch adds a command line driven mechanism to move all DMA memory into
>> a predefined shared memory region which may or may not be part of the
>> physical address layout of the Operating System.
>>
>> Ideally, the typical path to set this configuration would be through Device
>> Tree or ACPI, but neither of the two mechanisms is standardized yet. Also,
>> in the x86 MicroVM use case, we have neither ACPI nor Device Tree, but
>> instead configure the system purely through kernel command line options.
>>
>> I'm sure other people will find the functionality useful going forward
>> though and extend it to be triggered by DT/ACPI in the future.
>
> I'm totally against hacking in a kernel parameter for this. We'll need
> a proper documented DT or ACPI way.

I'm with you on that sentiment, but in the environment I'm currently
looking at, we have neither DT nor ACPI: The kernel gets purely
configured via kernel command line. For other unenumerable artifacts on
the system, such as virtio-mmio platform devices, that works well enough
and also basically "hacks a kernel parameter" to specify the system layout.

> We also need to feed this information
> into the actual DMA bounce buffering decisions and not just the swiotlb
> placement.

Care to elaborate a bit here? I was under the impression that
"swiotlb=force" basically allows you to steer the DMA bounce buffering
decisions already.


Thanks!

Alex



Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-26 18:13    [W:1.795 / U:0.392 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site