[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] ptp_ocelot: support 4 programmable pins
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:34:52AM +0000, Y.b. Lu wrote:
> > Of course, that is horrible, and I am going to find a way to fix it.
> Thanks a lot.
> Do you think it is ok to move protection into ptp_set_pinfunc() to protect just pin_config accessing?
> ptp_disable_pinfunc() not touching pin_config could be out of protection.
> But it seems indeed total ptp_set_pinfunc() should be under protection...

Yes, and I have way to fix that. I will post a patch soon...

> I could modify commit messages to indicate the pin supports both PTP_PF_PEROUT and PTP_PF_EXTTS, and PTP_PF_EXTTS support will be added in the future.

Thanks for explaining. Since you do have programmable pin, please
wait for my patch to fix the deadlock.


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-26 15:00    [W:0.058 / U:0.832 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site