lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Mar 26
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 10:50, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20200325:
>
> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
>
> The input tree still had its build failure for which I disabled a driver.
>
> The tip tree gained a semantic conflict against the battery tree.
>
> The irqchip tree still had its build failure for which I reverted
> 2 commits.
>
> The rcu tree gained a conflict against the spdx tree.
>
> The kvm tree gained a conflict against the spdx tree.
>
> The drivers-x86 tree gained a conflict against the tip tree.
>
> The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10806
> 9415 files changed, 417170 insertions(+), 204705 deletions(-)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ). If you
> are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
> to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
> old one. You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
> master.
>
> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
> file in the source. There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log
> files in the Next directory. Between each merge, the tree was built
> with a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc, an allmodconfig for x86_64, a
> multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native build of tools/perf. After
> the final fixups (if any), I do an x86_64 modules_install followed by
> builds for x86_64 allnoconfig, powerpc allnoconfig (32 and 64 bit),
> ppc44x_defconfig, allyesconfig and pseries_le_defconfig and i386, sparc
> and sparc64 defconfig and htmldocs. And finally, a simple boot test
> of the powerpc pseries_le_defconfig kernel in qemu (with and without
> kvm enabled).
>
> Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
>
> I am currently merging 316 trees (counting Linus' and 78 trees of bug
> fix patches pending for the current merge release).
>
> Stats about the size of the tree over time can be seen at
> http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html .
>
> Status of my local build tests will be at
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next . If maintainers want to give
> advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add
> more builds.
>
> Thanks to Randy Dunlap for doing many randconfig builds. And to Paul
> Gortmaker for triage and bug fixes.

When building todays tag on arm64 I see this error, CONFIG_DRM_MEDIATEK=m

ERROR: modpost: "mtk_mmsys_ddp_disconnect"
[drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mediatek-drm.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "mtk_mmsys_ddp_connect"
[drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mediatek-drm.ko] undefined!
make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.modpost:94: __modpost] Error 1
make[1]: *** [/linux/Makefile:1299: modules] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:180: sub-make] Error 2

I think this is the problematic patch:
396c3fccaf03 ("soc / drm: mediatek: Move routing control to mmsys device")

Cheers,
Anders

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-26 13:06    [W:0.023 / U:25.472 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site