lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/7] bus: mhi: core: Add support for reading MHI info from device
From
Date
On 3/24/2020 8:38 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 3/24/2020 12:10 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> The MHI register base has several registers used for getting the MHI
>> specific information such as version, family, major, and minor numbers
>> from the device. This information can be used by the controller drivers
>> for usecases such as applying quirks for a specific revision etc...
>>
>> While at it, let's also rearrange the local variables
>> in mhi_register_controller().
>>
>> Suggested-by: Hemant Kumar <hemantk@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c     | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>   include/linux/mhi.h             | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
>> index eb7f556a8531..d136f6c6ca78 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/init.c
>> @@ -802,12 +802,12 @@ static int parse_config(struct mhi_controller
>> *mhi_cntrl,
>>   int mhi_register_controller(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>>                   struct mhi_controller_config *config)
>>   {
>> -    int ret;
>> -    int i;
>>       struct mhi_event *mhi_event;
>>       struct mhi_chan *mhi_chan;
>>       struct mhi_cmd *mhi_cmd;
>>       struct mhi_device *mhi_dev;
>> +    u32 soc_info;
>> +    int ret, i;
>>       if (!mhi_cntrl)
>>           return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -874,6 +874,21 @@ int mhi_register_controller(struct mhi_controller
>> *mhi_cntrl,
>>           mhi_cntrl->unmap_single = mhi_unmap_single_no_bb;
>>       }
>> +    /* Read the MHI device info */
>> +    ret = mhi_read_reg(mhi_cntrl, mhi_cntrl->regs,
>> +               SOC_HW_VERSION_OFFS, &soc_info);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +        goto error_alloc_dev;
>> +
>> +    mhi_cntrl->family_number = (soc_info &
>> SOC_HW_VERSION_FAM_NUM_BMSK) >>
>> +                    SOC_HW_VERSION_FAM_NUM_SHFT;
>> +    mhi_cntrl->device_number = (soc_info &
>> SOC_HW_VERSION_DEV_NUM_BMSK) >>
>> +                    SOC_HW_VERSION_DEV_NUM_SHFT;
>> +    mhi_cntrl->major_version = (soc_info &
>> SOC_HW_VERSION_MAJOR_VER_BMSK) >>
>> +                    SOC_HW_VERSION_MAJOR_VER_SHFT;
>> +    mhi_cntrl->minor_version = (soc_info &
>> SOC_HW_VERSION_MINOR_VER_BMSK) >>
>> +                    SOC_HW_VERSION_MINOR_VER_SHFT;
>> +
>>       /* Register controller with MHI bus */
>>       mhi_dev = mhi_alloc_device(mhi_cntrl);
>>       if (IS_ERR(mhi_dev)) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
>> b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
>> index 18066302e6e2..5deadfaa053a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/core/internal.h
>> @@ -196,6 +196,16 @@ extern struct bus_type mhi_bus_type;
>>   #define BHIE_RXVECSTATUS_STATUS_XFER_COMPL (0x02)
>>   #define BHIE_RXVECSTATUS_STATUS_ERROR (0x03)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_OFFS (0x224)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_FAM_NUM_BMSK (0xF0000000)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_FAM_NUM_SHFT (28)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_DEV_NUM_BMSK (0x0FFF0000)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_DEV_NUM_SHFT (16)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_MAJOR_VER_BMSK (0x0000FF00)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_MAJOR_VER_SHFT (8)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_MINOR_VER_BMSK (0x000000FF)
>> +#define SOC_HW_VERSION_MINOR_VER_SHFT (0)
>
> I'm tempted to give reviewed-by, however it occurs to me that I don't
> see this in the MHI spec.  I'm looking at Rev E, which as far as I am
> aware is the latest.
>
> Hemant, is this in the spec, and if so, what Rev?
>
> I'm concerned that if its not in the spec, we may have an issue with
> some device not implementing this as expected.
>

Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>

I talked with Hemant offline, and this is queued up for the next spec
rev. I'm satisfied with that.

--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-25 20:05    [W:0.049 / U:6.760 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site