lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] Add KUnit Struct to Current Task
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 5:42 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Patricia Alfonso wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 9:40 AM Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Patricia Alfonso wrote:
> > >
> > > > In order to integrate debugging tools like KASAN into the KUnit
> > > > framework, add KUnit struct to the current task to keep track of the
> > > > current KUnit test.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > index 04278493bf15..1fbfa0634776 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > > @@ -1180,6 +1180,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> > > > unsigned int kasan_depth;
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > > > +#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
> > >
> > > This patch set looks great! You might have noticed I
> > > refreshed the kunit resources stuff to incorporate
> > > feedback from Brendan, but I don't think any API changes
> > > were made that should have consequences for your code
> > > (I'm building with your patches on top to make sure).
> > > I'd suggest promoting from RFC to v3 on the next round
> > > unless anyone objects.
> > >
> > > As Dmitry suggested, the above could likely be changed to be
> > > "#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT" as kunit can be built as a
> > > module also. More on this in patch 2..
> > >
> > I suppose this could be changed so that this can be used in possible
> > future scenarios, but for now, since built-in things can't rely on
> > modules, the KASAN integration relies on KUnit being built-in.
> >
>
> I think we can get around that. I've tried tweaking the resources
> patchset such that the functions you need in KASAN (which
> is builtin) are declared as "static inline" in include/kunit/test.h;
> doing this allows us to build kunit and test_kasan as a
> module while supporting the builtin functionality required to
> retrieve and use kunit resources within KASAN itself.
>
Okay, great!

> The impact of this amounts to a few functions, but it would
> require a rebase of your changes. I'll send out a v3 of the
> resources patches shortly; I just want to do some additional
> testing on them. I can also send you the modified versions of
> your patches that I used to test with.
>
That sounds good.

> With these changes I can run the tests on baremetal
> x86_64 by modprobe'ing test_kasan. However I see a few failures:
>
> [ 87.577012] # kasan_memchr: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:509
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.577104] not ok 30 - kasan_memchr
> [ 87.603823] # kasan_memcmp: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_kasan.c:523
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.603929] not ok 31 - kasan_memcmp
> [ 87.630644] # kasan_strings: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/test_kasan.c:544
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.630910] # kasan_strings: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/test_kasan.c:546
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.654037] # kasan_strings: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/test_kasan.c:548
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.677179] # kasan_strings: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/test_kasan.c:550
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.700242] # kasan_strings: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/test_kasan.c:552
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.723336] # kasan_strings: EXPECTATION FAILED at
> lib/test_kasan.c:554
> Expected kasan_data->report_expected == kasan_data->report_found,
> but
> kasan_data->report_expected == 1
> kasan_data->report_found == 0
> [ 87.746304] not ok 32 - kasan_strings
>
> The above three tests consistently fail while everything
> else passes, and happen irrespective of whether kunit
> is built as a module or built-in. Let me know if you
> need any more info to debug (I built the kernel with
> CONFIG_SLUB=y if that matters).
>
Unfortunately, I have not been able to replicate this issue and I
don't have a clue why these specific tests would fail with a different
configuration. I've tried running these tests on UML with KUnit
built-in with SLUB=y and SLAB=y, and I've done the same in x86_64. Let
me know if there's anything else that could help me debug this myself.


> Thanks!
>
> Alan
>
>
> > > > + struct kunit *kunit_test;
> > > > +#endif /* IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) */
> > > > +
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > > > /* Index of current stored address in ret_stack: */
> > > > int curr_ret_stack;
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1.696.g5e7596f4ac-goog
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Best,
> > Patricia
> >



--
Best,
Patricia

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-25 20:01    [W:0.086 / U:3.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site