lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 14/37] KVM: x86: Move "flush guest's TLB" logic to separate kvm_x86_ops hook
Date
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> On 25/03/20 11:23, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> What do you think about the following (very lightly
>> tested)?
>>
>> commit 485b4a579605597b9897b3d9ec118e0f7f1138ad
>> Author: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed Mar 25 11:14:25 2020 +0100
>>
>> KVM: x86: make Hyper-V PV TLB flush use tlb_flush_guest()
>>
>> Hyper-V PV TLB flush mechanism does TLB flush on behalf of the guest
>> so doing tlb_flush_all() is an overkill, switch to using tlb_flush_guest()
>> (just like KVM PV TLB flush mechanism) instead. Introduce
>> KVM_REQ_HV_TLB_FLUSH to support the change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 167729624149..8c5659ed211b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
>> #define KVM_REQ_APICV_UPDATE \
>> KVM_ARCH_REQ_FLAGS(25, KVM_REQUEST_WAIT | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP)
>> #define KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH_CURRENT KVM_ARCH_REQ(26)
>> +#define KVM_REQ_HV_TLB_FLUSH KVM_ARCH_REQ(27)
>>
>> #define CR0_RESERVED_BITS \
>> (~(unsigned long)(X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_MP | X86_CR0_EM | X86_CR0_TS \
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> index a86fda7a1d03..0d051ed11f38 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
>> @@ -1425,8 +1425,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *current_vcpu, u64 ingpa,
>> * vcpu->arch.cr3 may not be up-to-date for running vCPUs so we can't
>> * analyze it here, flush TLB regardless of the specified address space.
>> */
>> - kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(kvm,
>> - KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP,
>> + kvm_make_vcpus_request_mask(kvm, KVM_REQ_HV_TLB_FLUSH,
>> vcpu_mask, &hv_vcpu->tlb_flush);
>>
>
> Looks good, but why are you dropping KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP?

My bad, KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP needs to stay.

--
Vitaly

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-25 17:08    [W:0.078 / U:1.984 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site