lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 00/48] atmel_mxt_ts misc
From
Date
Hi Dmitry

On 2020/03/24 23:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 23.03.2020 05:25, Wang, Jiada пишет:
>> Hello Dmitry
>>
>> On 2020/03/21 0:53, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> Hello Jiada,
>>>
>>> 20.03.2020 06:37, Wang, Jiada пишет:
>>>> Hello Dmitry
>>>>
>>>> I have submitted v8 patch-set to address your comments towards v7
>>>> patch-set,
>>>> most of checkpatch warnings and errors have been addressed,
>>>>
>>>> But I didn't update for following two types of warnings
>>>> since I want to keep consistency with legacy code
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: DEVICE_ATTR unusual permissions '0600' used
>>>> #290: FILE: drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c:3761:
>>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(debug_v2_enable, 0600, NULL,
>>>
>>> What will happen if you'll use 0644? Will an empty line be returned or
>>> driver will crash?
>>>
>> debug_v2_enable doesn't have .show callback implemented, so after change
>> permission to 644, read of it results in an I/O error,
>>
>> for other 0600 permission interfaces (t38_data, t25 and debug_enable)
>> added in this series,
>> change to 644 can return expected information when read.
>>
>> Do you think it's better to change debug_v2_enable to 0200,
>> and others to 0644?
>
> Since the debug_enable has mxt_debug_enable_show(), the same should be
> done for debug_v2_enable, for consistency.
>
> The permissions should be 0644 for everything that is read/write.
>
> The 0200 should be used for everything that is root-only and write-only.

Thanks for your comments and suggestion in another email,
I will submit v9 patch-set to address these warnings

Thanks,
Jiada
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-25 13:14    [W:0.132 / U:4.924 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site