lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Indicate Microsoft vendor extension for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260
From
Date
Hi Miao-chen,

> This adds a bit mask of driver_info for Microsoft vendor extension and
> indicates the support for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260. See
> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/bluetooth/
> microsoft-defined-bluetooth-hci-commands-and-events for more information
> about the extension. This was verified with Intel ThunderPeak BT controller
> where msft_vnd_ext_opcode is 0xFC1E.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Define struct msft_vnd_ext and add a field of this type to struct
> hci_dev to facilitate the support of Microsoft vendor extension.
>
> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index 3bdec42c9612..4c49f394f174 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static struct usb_driver btusb_driver;
> #define BTUSB_CW6622 0x100000
> #define BTUSB_MEDIATEK 0x200000
> #define BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH 0x400000
> +#define BTUSB_MSFT_VND_EXT 0x800000
>
> static const struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = {
> /* Generic Bluetooth USB device */
> @@ -335,7 +336,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
>
> /* Intel Bluetooth devices */
> { USB_DEVICE(0x8087, 0x0025), .driver_info = BTUSB_INTEL_NEW |
> - BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH },
> + BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH |
> + BTUSB_MSFT_VND_EXT },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x8087, 0x0026), .driver_info = BTUSB_INTEL_NEW |
> BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x8087, 0x0029), .driver_info = BTUSB_INTEL_NEW |
> @@ -348,7 +350,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
> { USB_DEVICE(0x8087, 0x0aa7), .driver_info = BTUSB_INTEL |
> BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x8087, 0x0aaa), .driver_info = BTUSB_INTEL_NEW |
> - BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH },
> + BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH |
> + BTUSB_MSFT_VND_EXT },
>
> /* Other Intel Bluetooth devices */
> { USB_VENDOR_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(0x8087, 0xe0, 0x01, 0x01),
> @@ -3734,6 +3737,8 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> hdev->send = btusb_send_frame;
> hdev->notify = btusb_notify;
>
> + hdev->msft_ext.opcode = HCI_OP_NOP;
> +

do this in the hci_alloc_dev procedure for every driver. This doesn’t belong in the driver.

> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> err = btusb_config_oob_wake(hdev);
> if (err)
> @@ -3800,6 +3805,11 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_STRICT_DUPLICATE_FILTER, &hdev->quirks);
> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_SIMULTANEOUS_DISCOVERY, &hdev->quirks);
> set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_NON_PERSISTENT_DIAG, &hdev->quirks);
> +
> + if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_MSFT_VND_EXT &&
> + (id->idProduct == 0x0025 || id->idProduct == 0x0aaa)) {

Please scrap this extra check. You already selected out the PID with the blacklist_table. In addition, I do not want to add a PID in two places in the driver.

An alternative is to not use BTUSB_MSFT_VND_EXT and let the Intel code set it based on the hardware / firmware revision it finds. We might need to discuss which is the better approach for the Intel hardware since not all PIDs are unique.

> + hdev->msft_ext.opcode = 0xFC1E;
> + }
> }
>
> if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_MARVELL)
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> index d4e28773d378..0ec3d9b41d81 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> @@ -244,6 +244,10 @@ struct amp_assoc {
>
> #define HCI_MAX_PAGES 3
>
> +struct msft_vnd_ext {
> + __u16 opcode;
> +};
> +
> struct hci_dev {
> struct list_head list;
> struct mutex lock;
> @@ -343,6 +347,8 @@ struct hci_dev {
>
> struct amp_assoc loc_assoc;
>
> + struct msft_vnd_ext msft_ext;
> +
> __u8 flow_ctl_mode;
>
> unsigned int auto_accept_delay;

Regards

Marcel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-25 09:12    [W:0.064 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site