Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: x86: Move init-only kvm_x86_ops to separate struct | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Date | Mon, 23 Mar 2020 20:47:04 +0100 |
| |
On 23/03/20 17:24, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Sounds cool! (not sure that with only two implementations people won't > call it 'over-engineered' but cool).
Yes, something like
#define KVM_X86_OP(name) .name = vmx_##name
(svm_##name for svm.c) and then
KVM_X86_OP(check_nested_events)
etc.
> My personal wish would just be that > function names in function implementations are not auto-generated so > e.g. a simple 'git grep vmx_hardware_setup' works
Yes, absolutely; the function names would still be written by hand.
Paolo
> but the way how we > fill vmx_x86_ops in can be macroed I guess.
| |