lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 02/37] KVM: nVMX: Validate the EPTP when emulating INVEPT(EXTENT_CONTEXT)
Date
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:

> Signal VM-Fail for the single-context variant of INVEPT if the specified
> EPTP is invalid. Per the INEVPT pseudocode in Intel's SDM, it's subject
> to the standard EPT checks:
>
> If VM entry with the "enable EPT" VM execution control set to 1 would
> fail due to the EPTP value then VMfail(Invalid operand to INVEPT/INVVPID);
>
> Fixes: bfd0a56b90005 ("nEPT: Nested INVEPT")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index 8578513907d7..f3774cef4fd4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -5156,8 +5156,12 @@ static int handle_invept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> }
>
> switch (type) {
> - case VMX_EPT_EXTENT_GLOBAL:
> case VMX_EPT_EXTENT_CONTEXT:
> + if (!nested_vmx_check_eptp(vcpu, operand.eptp))
> + return nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu,
> + VMXERR_INVALID_OPERAND_TO_INVEPT_INVVPID);

I was going to ask "and we don't seem to check that current nested VMPTR
is valid, how can we know that nested_vmx_failValid() is the right
VMfail() to use" but then I checked our nested_vmx_failValid() and there
is a fallback there:

if (vmx->nested.current_vmptr == -1ull && !vmx->nested.hv_evmcs)
return nested_vmx_failInvalid(vcpu);

so this is a non-issue. My question, however, transforms into "would it
make sense to introduce nested_vmx_fail() implementing the logic from
SDM:

VMfail(ErrorNumber):
IF VMCS pointer is valid
THEN VMfailValid(ErrorNumber);
ELSE VMfailInvalid;
FI;

to assist an innocent reader of the code?"

> + fallthrough;
> + case VMX_EPT_EXTENT_GLOBAL:
> /*
> * TODO: Sync the necessary shadow EPT roots here, rather than
> * at the next emulated VM-entry.

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>

--
Vitaly

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-23 15:52    [W:0.359 / U:0.728 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site