lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V10 02/11] iommu/uapi: Define a mask for bind data
From
Date
On 2020/3/24 3:37, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:29:32 +0800> Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2020/3/21 7:27, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>> Memory type related flags can be grouped together for one simple
>>> check.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v9 renamed from EMT to MTS since these are memory type support
>>> flags. ---
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan<jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/uapi/linux/iommu.h | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
>>> index 4ad3496e5c43..d7bcbc5f79b0 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
>>> @@ -284,7 +284,10 @@ struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data_vtd {
>>> __u32 pat;
>>> __u32 emt;
>>> };
>>> -
>>> +#define IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_MTS_MASK
>>> (IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_CD | \
>>> + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_EMTE
>>> | \
>>> + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_PCD
>>> | \
>>> +
>>> IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_PWT)
>> As name implies, can this move to intel-iommu.h?
>>
> I also thought about this but the masks are in vendor specific part of
> the UAPI.
>

I looked through this patch series. It looks good to me. I will do some
code style cleanup and take it to v5.7. I am not the right person to
decide whether include/uapi/linux/iommu.h is the right place for this,
so I will move it to Intel IOMMU driver for now.

Best regards,
baolu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-24 02:50    [W:0.088 / U:3.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site