lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.19 00/48] 4.19.112-rc1 review
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:11:39PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 13:41, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 09:03:17AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 08:00:32PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 01:12 +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 18:50, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > > > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.112 release.
> > > > > > There are 48 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > > let me know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Responses should be made by Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0000.
> > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.112-rc1.gz
> > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
> > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > greg k-h
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
> > > > > > mmc: sdhci-omap: Fix Tuning procedure for temperatures < -20C
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
> > > > > > mmc: sdhci-omap: Don't finish_mrq() on a command error during tuning
> > > > >
> > > > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > > > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> > > > >
> > > > > NOTE:
> > > > > The arm beagleboard x15 device running stable rc 4.19.112-rc1, 5.4.27-rc1
> > > > > and 5.5.11-rc2 kernel pops up the following messages on console log,
> > > > > Is this a problem ?
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 15.737765] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
> > > > > [ 16.754248] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
> > > > > [ 16.842071] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
> > > > > ...
> > > > > [ 977.126652] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
> > > > > [ 985.449798] mmc1: unspecified timeout for CMD6 - use generic
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > This warning was introduced by commit 533a6cfe08f9 "mmc: core: Default
> > > > to generic_cmd6_time as timeout in __mmc_switch()". That should not be
> > > > applied to stable branches; it is not valid without (at least) these
> > > > preparatory changes:
> > > >
> > > > 0c204979c691 mmc: core: Cleanup BKOPS support
> > > > 24ed3bd01d6a mmc: core: Specify timeouts for BKOPS and CACHE_FLUSH for eMMC
> > > > ad91619aa9d7 mmc: block: Use generic_cmd6_time when modifying INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD
> > >
> > > Ok, I've now dropped that patch, which also required me to drop
> > > 1292e3efb149 ("mmc: core: Allow host controllers to require R1B for
> > > CMD6"). I've done so for 5.5.y, 5.4.y, and 4.19.y.
> >
> > Ugh, I forgot, that broke other things. I'm going to go rip out a bunch
> > of mmc patches now...
>
> [Am i missing rc2 tag ?]

Nope, didn't do one.

> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Wonderful, thanks!

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-21 08:10    [W:0.081 / U:14.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site