lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] sched/cpuset: distribute tasks within affinity masks
On 03/19/20 15:45, Josh Don wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:35 AM Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 03/17/20 14:35, Josh Don wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 7:05 AM Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It might be a good idea to split the API from the user too.
> > >
> > > Not sure what you mean by this, could you clarify?
> >
> > I meant it'd be a good idea to split the cpumask API into its own patch and
> > have a separate patch for the user in sched/core.c. But that was a small nit.
> > If the user (in sched/core.c) somehow introduces a regression, reverting it
> > separately should be trivial.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> Ah, yes I agree that sounds like a good idea, I can do that.
>
> Peter, any other nit before I re-send?

AFAICT it was already picked up, so no need to resend to fix the nits from my
side.

--
Qais Yousef

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-20 12:28    [W:0.071 / U:8.896 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site