lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
Date
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:

> Regarding open flags, I think the key point for future APIs is to avoid
> using the set of flags for both control of the operation itself
> (O_NOFOLLOW/AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, O_NOCTTY) and properaties of the
> resulting descriptor (O_RDWR, O_SYNC). I expect that doing that would
> help code that has to re-create an equivalent descriptor. The operation
> flags are largely irrelevant to that if you can get the descriptor by
> other means.

It would also be nice to sort out the problem with O_CLOEXEC. That can have a
different value, depending on the arch - so it excludes at least three bits
from the O_* flag set.

David

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-02 15:31    [W:0.142 / U:5.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site