Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC v3 00/10] DDR/L3 Scaling support on SDM845 and SC7180 SoCs | From | Rajendra Nayak <> | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:23:32 +0530 |
| |
On 3/19/2020 3:54 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19-03-20, 15:41, Sibi Sankar wrote: >> Viresh, >> Saravana's example does show a device >> with multiple opp tables but doesn't >> need multiple opp table support to >> land though (since it works fine with >> the current implementation). I am more >> interested in understanding your/ >> Stephen's/Saravana's stance on adding >> multiple opp-table support. Personally >> I feel its inevitable, since multiple >> qc drivers using interconnect opp-tables, >> routinely need vote on multiple paths in >> a non-trivial manner. > > The OPP core doesn't support multiple OPP tables for a device and I > don't understand how it will. And so I have been waiting for a reply.
I thought this series indeed is proposing to add that support in OPP core? a.k.a "[RFC v3 06/10] opp: Allow multiple opp_tables to be mapped to a single device"
> >>> >>> Could you please post a link to the discussion that you are referring to >>> here? >>> I looked at a few links posted in the cover letter as dependencies and >>> it seems >>> like the discussions are pending for *months* and not weeks but I >>> might have looked >>> at the wrong ones. >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200114103448.odnvqawnqb3twst5@vireshk-i7/ >> >> Rajendra, >> Viresh is referring to ^^ one > > Right, thanks.
These discussions are stalled for over 2 months now waiting on a response from Saravana. Viresh, whats the way forward here and how long do we plan on waiting for Saravanas response?
-- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
| |