lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] docs: locking: Add 'need' to hardirq section
From
Date
Quoting Jonathan Corbet (2020-03-18 07:55:42)
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:44:25 -0700
> Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > Add the missing word to make this sentence read properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
> > index a8518ac0d31d..9850c1e52607 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-hacking/locking.rst
> > @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ by a hardware interrupt on another CPU. This is where
> > interrupts on that cpu, then grab the lock.
> > :c:func:`spin_unlock_irq()` does the reverse.
> >
> > -The irq handler does not to use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()`, because
> > +The irq handler does not need to use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()`, because
>
> Please take out the :c:func: stuff while you're at it, we don't need that
> anymore. Just spin_lock_irq() will do the right thing.
>

Ok. I'll make two patches then to remove func throughout this file and
you can decide to squash them or not.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-18 18:32    [W:0.058 / U:3.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site