[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v28 21/22] x86/vdso: Implement a vDSO for Intel SGX enclave call
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 23:27 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 09:57 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > For the vDSO, only marginally. I'm counting +4,-2 instructions in my
> > suggestions. For the wrapper, things become significantly simpler.
> Simpler is not a quality that has very high importance here except
> when it comes to vDSO.
> At least it is not enough to change to vDSO. What else?

In any case, where I stand is that the vDSO implementation itself is
exactly how it should be. The process to get it to this form was
tedious. Now we have a form that the known userbase can live with.

The documentation sucks, agreed. I think by fixing that this would
be a wholelot better.


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-16 22:30    [W:0.122 / U:2.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site