lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/4] PM / EM: add devices to Energy Model
On Friday 13 Mar 2020 at 16:49:24 (+0000), Lukasz Luba wrote:
<snip>
> Well if someone would add EM to its platform and call this in
> hotplug, which is used as cooling method, will see a lot of warnings.

Right, but I guess I was arguing that calling this for CPUs, even on
hotplug, is kinda wrong.

> I would rather avoid stressing people with this kind of warnings.
> This is under control and nothing really happens even when they
> do hotplug very often, like LTP stress tests.
>
> I agree to add a print there but warning for me is when something
> is not OK and should be investigated.
> I would prefer dev_dbg_once() to print thet the EM is not going to be
> removed. This will also not pollute dmesg in many logs.

Fair enough, a WARN is maybe a bit over the top. A debug message
should work.


<snip>
> So these small changes will be present in v5. I have to wait a few
> days because there is one change to devfreq_cooling.c queuing and I will
> send v5 with updated patch 3/4 rebased on top.

Sounds good, thanks.
Quentin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-13 18:16    [W:0.065 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site