Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Mar 2020 08:25:22 +0100 | From | Miquel Raynal <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific lock/unlock operation |
| |
Hi Mason, Boris,
masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:40:04 +0800:
> Hi Boris, > > > > Add nand_lock() & nand_unlock() for manufacturer specific lock & > unlock > > > operation while the device supports Block Portection function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw> > > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > > > Reported-by on something that's not a fix doesn't make sense. I know > > the 0day bot asked you to add this tag, but that should only be done if > > you submit a separate patch, ideally with a Fixes tag. If the offending > > patch has not been merged yet, you should just fix the commit and ignore > > the Reported-by tag (you can mention who reported the problem in the > > changelog though).
Yesterday when applying all the NAND patches my personal IP address got flagged as spam by mistake (~500 mails in ~10s) so I could not answer manually as I wished.
Indeed, this Reported-by tag was not needed and I dropped it manually when applying. This tag is meant to show an error that was existing *before* your series and that you are fixing with your series. This is not something you should add when a robot tells you something is wrong in your series.
Also, I rewrote several paragraphs and I prefixed two of them with "mtd: rawnand: macronix:".
Thanks, Miquèl
| |