lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Subject[PATCH RFC 0/9] nxt propagation + locking optimisation
Date
There are several independent parts in the patchset, but bundled
to make a point.
1-2: random stuff, that implicitly used later.
3-5: restore @nxt propagation
6-8: optimise locking in io_worker_handle_work()
9: optimise io_uring refcounting

The next propagation bits are done similarly as it was before, but
- nxt stealing is now at top-level, but not hidden in handlers
- ensure there is no with REQ_F_DONT_STEAL_NEXT

[6-8] is the reason to dismiss the previous @nxt propagation appoach,
I didn't found a good way to do the same. Even though it looked
clearer and without new flag.

Performance tested it with link-of-nops + IOSQE_ASYNC:

link size: 100
orig: 501 (ns per nop)
0-8: 446
0-9: 416

link size: 10
orig: 826
0-8: 776
0-9: 756

Pavel Begunkov (9):
io_uring: clean up io_close
io-wq: fix IO_WQ_WORK_NO_CANCEL cancellation
io_uring: make submission ref putting consistent
io_uring: remove @nxt from handlers
io_uring: get next req on subm ref drop
io-wq: shuffle io_worker_handle_work() code
io-wq: io_worker_handle_work() optimise locking
io-wq: optimise double lock for io_get_next_work()
io_uring: pass submission ref to async

fs/io-wq.c | 162 ++++++++++++----------
fs/io_uring.c | 366 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
2 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)

--
2.24.0

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-01 17:19    [W:0.126 / U:2.136 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site