lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: convert extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
From
Date


On 6/2/20 22:40, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:47:59PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> Hi Dafna,
>>
>> On 5/2/20 12:00, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
>>> convert the binding file extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt to yaml format
>>> This was tested and verified on ARM with:
>>> make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>> make dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> 1 - changing the license to (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> 2 - changing the maintainers
>>> 3 - changing the google,usb-port-id property to have minimum 0 and maximum 255
>>>
>>> .../bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt | 24 ----------
>>> .../bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
>>> deleted file mode 100644
>>> index 8e8625c00dfa..000000000000
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.txt
>>> +++ /dev/null
>>> @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
>>> -ChromeOS EC USB Type-C cable and accessories detection
>>> -
>>> -On ChromeOS systems with USB Type C ports, the ChromeOS Embedded Controller is
>>> -able to detect the state of external accessories such as display adapters
>>> -or USB devices when said accessories are attached or detached.
>>> -
>>> -The node for this device must be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
>>> -or google,cros-ec-i2c.
>>> -
>>> -Required properties:
>>> -- compatible: Should be "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec".
>>> -- google,usb-port-id: Specifies the USB port ID to use.
>>> -
>>> -Example:
>>> - cros-ec@0 {
>>> - compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c";
>>> -
>>> - ...
>>> -
>>> - extcon {
>>> - compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
>>> - google,usb-port-id = <0>;
>>> - };
>>> - }
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..fd95e413d46f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/extcon/extcon-usbc-cros-ec.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: ChromeOS EC USB Type-C cable and accessories detection
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
>>> + - Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> + On ChromeOS systems with USB Type C ports, the ChromeOS Embedded Controller is
>>> + able to detect the state of external accessories such as display adapters
>>> + or USB devices when said accessories are attached or detached.
>>> + The node for this device must be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi
>>> + or google,cros-ec-i2c.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec
>>> +
>>> + google,usb-port-id:
>>> + allOf:
>>> + - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> + description: the port id
>>> + minimum: 0
>>> + maximum: 255
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - google,usb-port-id
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> + - |
>>> + cros-ec@0 {
>>> + compatible = "google,cros-ec-i2c";
>>
>> Now that you are here ... could you use compatible = "google,cros-ec-spi" here?
>>
>> The reason is that the label above, cros-ec@0 is not really correct for an i2c
>> device because after the @ you should put the address, cros-ec@1e will have more
>> sense here. But cros-ec-i2c is rarely used, so I'd change the compatible to use
>> "google,cros-ec-spi" and the entry "cros-ec@0" is fine.
>>
>>> + extcon {
>>> + compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
>>> + google,usb-port-id = <0>;
>>> + };
>>
>> And maybe would be useful have a more complete example like this?
>>
>> cros-ec@0 {
>> compatible = "google,cros-ec-spi";
>
> There should also be a 'spi' parent node and 'reg' here.
>
>>
>> usbc_extcon0: extcon@0 {
>
> And no unit-address here as there's no 'reg'.
>

Thanks for pointing all this, I'll fix current users of this binding, as they
are wrong.

Thanks,
Enric

>> compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
>> google,usb-port-id = <0>;
>> };
>>
>>
>> usbc_extcon1: extcon@1 {
>> compatible = "google,extcon-usbc-cros-ec";
>> google,usb-port-id = <1>;
>> };
>> };

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-07 09:07    [W:0.053 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site