lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] locking/rwsem: Remove RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 09:50:49AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Anyway, I'll go split, since you seem to care so deeply.

---

Subject: locking/rwsem: Remove RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue Feb 4 09:34:37 CET 2020

Remove the now unused RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN hack. This hack breaks
PREEMPT_RT and getting rid of it was the entire motivation for
re-writing the percpu rwsem.

The biggest problem is that it is fundamentally incompatible with any
form of Priority Inheritance, any exclusively held lock must have a
distinct owner.

Requested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/rwsem.h | 6 ------
kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
#endif
};

-/*
- * Setting all bits of the owner field except bit 0 will indicate
- * that the rwsem is writer-owned with an unknown owner.
- */
-#define RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN (-2L)
-
/* In all implementations count != 0 means locked */
static inline int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c
@@ -659,8 +659,6 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_own
unsigned long flags;
bool ret = true;

- BUILD_BUG_ON(!(RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN & RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE));
-
if (need_resched()) {
lockevent_inc(rwsem_opt_fail);
return false;
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-04 10:23    [W:0.239 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site