lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/3] [media] dt-bindings: Add binding for rk3228 rga
Date
Hi Mauro,

Am Montag, 3. Februar 2020, 23:40:15 CET schrieb Justin Swartz:
> Indicate that the rk3228 rga is compatible with that of the rk3288.
>
> But if any rk3228-specific quirks are identified in future that
> require handling logic that differs from what is provided for the
> rk3288, then allow for the compatibility string "rockchip,rk3228-rga"
> to be matched instead of "rockchip,rk3288-rga".
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@risingedge.co.za>

what is the process in the media-world for this dt-binding only patch?

Do you want to apply it, or should I just also apply it with the following
2 dt-patches? There shouldn't be any conflicts with the media tree
as this patch really only affects the rga binding document.

Thanks
Heiko

> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt
> index fd5276abf..c53a8e513 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.txt
> @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ BitBLT, alpha blending and image blur/sharpness.
>
> Required properties:
> - compatible: value should be one of the following
> - "rockchip,rk3288-rga";
> - "rockchip,rk3399-rga";
> + "rockchip,rk3228-rga", "rockchip,rk3288-rga": for Rockchip RK3228
> + "rockchip,rk3288-rga": for Rockchip RK3288
> + "rockchip,rk3399-rga": for Rockchip RK3399
>
> - interrupts: RGA interrupt specifier.
>
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-01 01:30    [W:0.075 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site