Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [v2 0/1] Documentation: bootconfig: Documentation updates | From | Markus Elfring <> | Date | Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:05:42 +0100 |
| |
> Didn't you read the article I shared?
I read also the article “Don’t Use ISO/IEC 14977 Extended Backus-Naur Form (EBNF)” by David A. Wheeler. Some possibilities were pointed out as desirable improvements.
> I actually wrote up the EBNF (ISO/IEC 14977) that was a good pazzle, > but just a toy.
I hope that this contribution can help to become more productive in the discussed application domain. https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/27/72 https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1200987/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/158278836196.14966.3881489301852781521.stgit@devnote2/
> I found no one use it to define their data format, according to the article, > including ISO itself (lol!) and there are many local extension, > including W3C EBNF, and those say "I'm EBNF".
I suggest to reconsider the current situation.
> Well, to say the least, I feel it is quite confused.
Such a view is reasonable.
> So, if you are interested in it, I don't stop you to write it up.
Will the collaboration continue anyhow?
> I just keep away from it.
This is a pity.
Will the clarification become more constructive for remaining challenges?
Regards, Markus
| |