Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/5] Make probes which emit dmesg warnings optional | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Date | Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:36:50 +0100 |
| |
On 2/26/20 6:22 PM, Quentin Monnet wrote: > 2020-02-26 17:59 UTC+0100 ~ Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org> >> Feature probes in bpftool related to bpf_probe_write_user and >> bpf_trace_printk helpers emit dmesg warnings which might be confusing >> for people running bpftool on production environments. This patch series >> addresses that by filtering them out by default and introducing the new >> positional argument "full" which enables all available probes. >> >> The main motivation behind those changes is ability the fact that some >> probes (for example those related to "trace" or "write_user" helpers) >> emit dmesg messages which might be confusing for people who are running >> on production environments. For details see the Cilium issue[0]. >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - Do not expose regex filters to users, keep filtering logic internal, >> expose only the "full" option for including probes which emit dmesg >> warnings. >> >> v2 -> v3: >> - Do not use regex for filtering out probes, use function IDs directly. >> - Fix bash completion - in v2 only "prefix" was proposed after "macros", >> "dev" and "kernel" were not. >> - Rephrase the man page paragraph, highlight helper function names. >> - Remove tests which parse the plain output of bpftool (except the >> header/macros test), focus on testing JSON output instead. >> - Add test which compares the output with and without "full" option. >> >> v3 -> v4: >> - Use enum to check for helper functions. >> - Make selftests compatible with older versions of Python 3.x than 3.7. >> >> [0] https://github.com/cilium/cilium/issues/10048 >> >> Michal Rostecki (5): >> bpftool: Move out sections to separate functions >> bpftool: Make probes which emit dmesg warnings optional >> bpftool: Update documentation of "bpftool feature" command >> bpftool: Update bash completion for "bpftool feature" command >> selftests/bpf: Add test for "bpftool feature" command >> >> .../bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-feature.rst | 19 +- >> tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool | 3 +- >> tools/bpf/bpftool/feature.c | 283 +++++++++++------- >> tools/testing/selftests/.gitignore | 5 +- >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 3 +- >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.py | 178 +++++++++++ >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.sh | 5 + >> 7 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.py >> create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool.sh >> > > Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> > (Please keep tags between versions.) > > Your change looks good. The tests in patch 5 still pass with Python 3.7.5 (but I have not tried to run with an older version of Python).
Looks better now ...
# ./test_bpftool.sh test_feature_dev_json (test_bpftool.TestBpftool) ... ok test_feature_kernel (test_bpftool.TestBpftool) ... ok test_feature_kernel_full (test_bpftool.TestBpftool) ... ok test_feature_kernel_full_vs_not_full (test_bpftool.TestBpftool) ... ok test_feature_macros (test_bpftool.TestBpftool) ... ok
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ran 5 tests in 0.253s
OK
... applied, thanks!
| |