Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] AT8031 PHY timestamping support
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:30:48PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote: > But then there would need to be such a hardware pin, correct? Unless > you'd misuse the INT# for it. Also, why should the PHY then have a PHC > which can be adjusted.
I see. Oh well. I'll just have to remember the AR8031 on my list of "ptp hardware to be avoided".