lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH][next] clone3: fix an unsigned args.cgroup comparison to less than zero
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:31:57AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 01:18:01PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 12:15:13AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 2diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> > index 2853e258fe1f..dca4dde3b5b2 100644
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > @@ -2618,7 +2618,8 @@ noinline static int copy_clone_args_from_user(struct kernel_clone_args *kargs,
> > !valid_signal(args.exit_signal)))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - if ((args.flags & CLONE_INTO_CGROUP) && args.cgroup < 0)
> > + if ((args.flags & CLONE_INTO_CGROUP) &&
> > + (args.cgroup > INT_MAX || (s64)args.cgroup < 0))
>
> If we're capping it at INT_MAX then the check for negative isn't
> required and static analysis tools know it's not so they might complain.

It isn't, but it's easier to understand for the reader. But I don't care
that much and if it's trouble for tools than fine.

Christian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-24 13:26    [W:0.059 / U:1.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site