lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/27] Add support for OpenCAPI Persistent Memory devices
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:21 AM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:28 PM Alastair D'Silva <alastair@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@d-silva.org>
> >
> > This series adds support for OpenCAPI Persistent Memory devices, exposing
> > them as nvdimms so that we can make use of the existing infrastructure.
>
> A single sentence to introduce:
>
> 24 files changed, 3029 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
> ...is inadequate. What are OpenCAPI Persistent Memory devices? How do
> they compare, in terms relevant to libnvdimm, to other persistent
> memory devices? What challenges do they pose to the existing enabling?
> What is the overall approach taken with this 27 patch break down? What
> are the changes since v2, v1? If you incorporated someone's review
> feedback note it in the cover letter changelog, if you didn't

Assumptions and tradeoffs the implementation considered are also
critical for reviewing the approach.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-21 17:25    [W:0.341 / U:3.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site