Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:16:37 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: [for-next][PATCH 12/26] Documentation: bootconfig: Add a doc for extended boot config |
| |
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:00:23 +0100 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:
> >>> +Currently the maximum config size size is 32KB … > >> > >> Would you like to avoid a word duplication here? > > > > Oops, still exist. > > Is there a need to separate the number from the following unit?
Sorry, I couldn't understand what you pointed here. Would you mean the number of file size and nodes?
> > Indeed, "node" is not well defined. What about this? > > --- > > Each key consists of words separated by dot, and value also consists of > > values separated by comma. Here, each word and each value is generally > > called a "node". > > I have got still understanding difficulties with such an interpretation. > > * Do other contributors find an other word also more appropriate for this use case?
No.
> * How will the influence evolve for naming these items?
Node is used in its API, but from the user's point of view, I think it is OK to use "key-word" and "value". Also, since it is hard to count those numbers by manual, I think user can depend on tools/bootconfig which shows the number of node in the configuration file now.
> * Is each element just a string (according to specific rules)?
Yes.
> >> Could an other wording be nicer than the abbreviation “a doc for … config” > >> in the commit subject? > > > > OK, I'll try next time. > > Will words like “descriptions”and “configuration”be helpful?
Like "descriptions of ..." ?
Thank you,
> > Regards, > Markus
-- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
| |