lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V4 5/5] vdpasim: vDPA device simulator
Date
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 02:11:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> +static void vdpasim_device_release(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct vdpasim *vdpasim = dev_to_sim(dev);
> +
> + cancel_work_sync(&vdpasim->work);
> + kfree(vdpasim->buffer);
> + vhost_iotlb_free(vdpasim->iommu);
> + kfree(vdpasim);
> +}
> +
> +static struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(void)
> +{
> + struct virtio_net_config *config;
> + struct vhost_iotlb *iommu;
> + struct vdpasim *vdpasim;
> + struct device *dev;
> + void *buffer;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + iommu = vhost_iotlb_alloc(2048, 0);
> + if (!iommu)
> + goto err;
> +
> + buffer = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buffer)
> + goto err_buffer;
> +
> + vdpasim = kzalloc(sizeof(*vdpasim), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vdpasim)
> + goto err_alloc;
> +
> + vdpasim->buffer = buffer;
> + vdpasim->iommu = iommu;
> +
> + config = &vdpasim->config;
> + config->mtu = 1500;
> + config->status = VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP;
> + eth_random_addr(config->mac);
> +
> + INIT_WORK(&vdpasim->work, vdpasim_work);
> + spin_lock_init(&vdpasim->lock);
> +
> + vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[0].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> + vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[1].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> +
> + dev = &vdpasim->dev;
> + dev->release = vdpasim_device_release;
> + dev->coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(64);
> + set_dma_ops(dev, &vdpasim_dma_ops);
> + dev_set_name(dev, "%s", VDPASIM_NAME);
> +
> + ret = device_register(&vdpasim->dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_init;

It is a bit weird to be creating this dummy parent, couldn't this be
done by just passing a NULL parent to vdpa_alloc_device, doing
set_dma_ops() on the vdpasim->vdpa->dev and setting dma_device to
vdpasim->vdpa->dev ?

> + vdpasim->vdpa = vdpa_alloc_device(dev, dev, &vdpasim_net_config_ops);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_vdpa;

> + ret = vdpa_register_device(vdpasim->vdpa);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_register;
> +
> + return vdpasim;
> +
> +err_register:
> + put_device(&vdpasim->vdpa->dev);
> +err_vdpa:
> + device_del(&vdpasim->dev);
> + goto err;
> +err_init:
> + put_device(&vdpasim->dev);
> + goto err;

If you do the vdmasim alloc first, and immediately do
device_initialize() then all the failure paths can do put_device
instead of having this ugly goto unwind split. Just check for
vdpasim->iommu == NULL during release.

> +static int __init vdpasim_dev_init(void)
> +{
> + vdpasim_dev = vdpasim_create();
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(vdpasim_dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return PTR_ERR(vdpasim_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int vdpasim_device_remove_cb(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = dev_to_vdpa(dev);
> +
> + vdpa_unregister_device(vdpa);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit vdpasim_dev_exit(void)
> +{
> + device_for_each_child(&vdpasim_dev->dev, NULL,
> + vdpasim_device_remove_cb);

Why the loop? There is only one device, and it is in the global
varaible vdmasim_dev ?

Jason

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-20 16:13    [W:0.174 / U:5.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site