Messages in this thread | | | From | Dan Williams <> | Date | Wed, 19 Feb 2020 08:37:25 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] mm/sparsemem: pfn_to_page is not valid yet on SPARSEMEM |
| |
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:57 AM Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:25:15PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 7:05 PM Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> > > > > > > When we use SPARSEMEM instead of SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, pfn_to_page() > > > doesn't work before sparse_init_one_section() is called. This leads to a > > > crash when hotplug memory: > > > > I'd also add: > > > > "On x86 the impact is limited to x86_32 builds, or x86_64 > > configurations that override the default setting for > > SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP". > > Do we also want to check how it affects, say, arm64, ia64 and ppc? ;-)
Sure, I just did not take the time to look up their respective default stances on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. For a distro looking to backport this commit I think it's helpful for them to understand if they are exposed or not.
| |