lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: possible deadlock in bpf_lru_push_free
From
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on:

HEAD commit: e20d3a05 bpf, offload: Replace bitwise AND by logical AND ..
git tree: bpf
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1491c481e00000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e7d35de59001df38
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=122b5421d14e68f29cd1
compiler: gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=16ca6c45e00000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=134bae29e00000

Bisection is inconclusive: the first bad commit could be any of:

36a375c6 mailmap: add entry for Tiezhu Yang
95c472ff Documentation/ko_KR/howto: Update a broken link
ff1e81a7 Documentation: build warnings related to missing blank lines after explicit markups has been fixed
5549c202 Documentation/ko_KR/howto: Update broken web addresses
599e6f8d Documentation: changes.rst: update several outdated project URLs
4bfdebd6 docs/locking: Fix outdated section names
d1c9038a Allow git builds of Sphinx
41dcd67e Merge tag 'docs-5.6-2' of git://git.lwn.net/linux

bisection log: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=17c6c36ee00000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+122b5421d14e68f29cd1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

IPVS: ftp: loaded support on port[0] = 21
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.5.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor198/9748 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffe8ffffc49158 (&l->lock){....}, at: bpf_lru_list_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:313 [inline]
ffffe8ffffc49158 (&l->lock){....}, at: bpf_common_lru_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:532 [inline]
ffffe8ffffc49158 (&l->lock){....}, at: bpf_lru_push_free+0xe5/0x5b0 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:555

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88809f6c3b60 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){....}, at: __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x617/0x1540 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1322

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){....}:
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
htab_lru_map_delete_node+0xce/0x2f0 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:593
__bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:220 [inline]
__bpf_lru_list_shrink+0xf9/0x470 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:266
bpf_percpu_lru_pop_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:416 [inline]
bpf_lru_pop_free+0xa9f/0x1670 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:497
prealloc_lru_pop+0x2c/0xa0 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:132
__htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0x67e/0xa90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1069
bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x16e/0x210 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1585
bpf_map_update_value.isra.0+0x2d7/0x8e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:181
map_update_elem kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1089 [inline]
__do_sys_bpf+0x3163/0x41e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3384
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3355 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x73/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3355
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

-> #0 (&l->lock){....}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2475 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2580 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2970 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3954
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
bpf_lru_list_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:313 [inline]
bpf_common_lru_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:532 [inline]
bpf_lru_push_free+0xe5/0x5b0 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:555
__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x8d4/0x1540 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1374
htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x37/0x40 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1474
bpf_map_do_batch+0x3f5/0x510 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3348
__do_sys_bpf+0x1f7d/0x41e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3456
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3355 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x73/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3355
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

other info that might help us debug this:

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
lock(&l->lock);
lock(&htab->buckets[i].lock);
lock(&l->lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor198/9748:
#0: ffffffff89bac200 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x54b/0x1540 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1308
#1: ffff88809f6c3b60 (&htab->buckets[i].lock){....}, at: __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x617/0x1540 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1322

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 9748 Comm: syz-executor198 Not tainted 5.5.0-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x197/0x210 lib/dump_stack.c:118
print_circular_bug.isra.0.cold+0x163/0x172 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1684
check_noncircular+0x32e/0x3e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1808
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2475 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2580 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2970 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2596/0x4a00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3954
lock_acquire+0x190/0x410 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4484
__raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:159
bpf_lru_list_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:313 [inline]
bpf_common_lru_push_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:532 [inline]
bpf_lru_push_free+0xe5/0x5b0 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:555
__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x8d4/0x1540 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1374
htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_and_delete_batch+0x37/0x40 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1474
bpf_map_do_batch+0x3f5/0x510 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3348
__do_sys_bpf+0x1f7d/0x41e0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3456
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3355 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x73/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3355
do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x790 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
RIP: 0033:0x440c09
Code: 18 89 d0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 7b 10 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007fff14512e08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004a2390 RCX: 0000000000440c09
RDX: 0000000000000038 RSI: 0000000020000100 RDI: 0000000000000019
RBP: 00000000006cb018 R08: 0000000120080522 R09: 0000000120080522
R10: 0000000120080522 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000402110
R13: 00000000004021a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-19 01:37    [W:0.104 / U:2.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site