lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] efi/libstub: Add support for loading the initrd from a device path
From
Date
On 02/17/20 10:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 10:15, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 02/16/20 15:11, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> There are currently two ways to specify the initrd to be passed to the
>>> Linux kernel when booting via the EFI stub:
>>> - it can be passed as a initrd= command line option when doing a pure PE
>>> boot (as opposed to the EFI handover protocol that exists for x86)
>>> - otherwise, the bootloader or firmware can load the initrd into memory,
>>> and pass the address and size via the bootparams struct (x86) or
>>> device tree (ARM)
>>>
>>> In the first case, we are limited to loading from the same file system
>>> that the kernel was loaded from, and it is also problematic in a trusted
>>> boot context, given that we cannot easily protect the command line from
>>> tampering without either adding complicated white/blacklisting of boot
>>> arguments or locking down the command line altogether.
>>>
>>> In the second case, we force the bootloader to duplicate knowledge about
>>> the boot protocol which is already encoded in the stub, and which may be
>>> subject to change over time, e.g., bootparams struct definitions, memory
>>> allocation/alignment requirements for the placement of the initrd etc etc.
>>> In the ARM case, it also requires the bootloader to modify the hardware
>>> description provided by the firmware, as it is passed in the same file.
>>> On systems where the initrd is measured after loading, it creates a time
>>> window where the initrd contents might be manipulated in memory before
>>> handing over to the kernel.
>>>
>>> Address these concerns by adding support for loading the initrd into
>>> memory by invoking the EFI LoadFile2 protocol installed on a vendor
>>> GUIDed device path that specifically designates a Linux initrd.
>>> This addresses the above concerns, by putting the EFI stub in charge of
>>> placement in memory and of passing the base and size to the kernel proper
>>> (via whatever means it desires) while still leaving it up to the firmware
>>> or bootloader to obtain the file contents, potentially from other file
>>> systems than the one the kernel itself was loaded from. On platforms that
>>> implement measured boot, it permits the firmware to take the measurement
>>> right before the kernel actually consumes the contents.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c | 15 +++-
>>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h | 4 +
>>> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/x86-stub.c | 23 ++++++
>>> include/linux/efi.h | 1 +
>>> 5 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
>>> index 2edc673ea06c..4bae620b95b9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c
>>> @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ unsigned long efi_entry(void *handle, efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
>>> enum efi_secureboot_mode secure_boot;
>>> struct screen_info *si;
>>> efi_properties_table_t *prop_tbl;
>>> + unsigned long max_addr;
>>>
>>> sys_table = sys_table_arg;
>>>
>>> @@ -258,10 +259,18 @@ unsigned long efi_entry(void *handle, efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
>>> if (!fdt_addr)
>>> pr_efi("Generating empty DTB\n");
>>>
>>> - status = efi_load_initrd(image, &initrd_addr, &initrd_size, ULONG_MAX,
>>> - efi_get_max_initrd_addr(dram_base, *image_addr));
>>> + max_addr = efi_get_max_initrd_addr(dram_base, *image_addr);
>>> + status = efi_load_initrd_dev_path(&initrd_addr, &initrd_size, max_addr);
>>> + if (status == EFI_SUCCESS) {
>>> + pr_efi("Loaded initrd from LINUX_EFI_INITRD_MEDIA_GUID device path\n");
>>> + } else if (status == EFI_NOT_FOUND) {
>>> + status = efi_load_initrd(image, &initrd_addr, &initrd_size,
>>> + ULONG_MAX, max_addr);
>>> + if (status == EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> + pr_efi("Loaded initrd from command line option\n");
>>> + }
>>> if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> - pr_efi_err("Failed initrd from command line!\n");
>>> + pr_efi_err("Failed to load initrd!\n");
>>>
>>> efi_random_get_seed();
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
>>> index 49008ac88b63..e37afe2c752e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub-helper.c
>>> @@ -299,3 +299,85 @@ void efi_char16_printk(efi_char16_t *str)
>>> efi_call_proto(efi_table_attr(efi_system_table(), con_out),
>>> output_string, str);
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * The LINUX_EFI_INITRD_MEDIA_GUID vendor media device path below provides a way
>>> + * for the firmware or bootloader to expose the initrd data directly to the stub
>>> + * via the trivial LoadFile2 protocol, which is defined in the UEFI spec, and is
>>> + * very easy to implement. It is a simple Linux initrd specific conduit between
>>> + * kernel and firmware, allowing us to put the EFI stub (being part of the
>>> + * kernel) in charge of where and when to load the initrd, while leaving it up
>>> + * to the firmware to decide whether it needs to expose its filesystem hierarchy
>>> + * via EFI protocols.
>>> + */
>>> +static const struct {
>>> + struct efi_vendor_dev_path vendor;
>>> + struct efi_generic_dev_path end;
>>> +} __packed initrd_dev_path = {
>>> + {
>>> + EFI_DEV_MEDIA,
>>> + EFI_DEV_MEDIA_VENDOR,
>>> + sizeof(struct efi_vendor_dev_path),
>>> + LINUX_EFI_INITRD_MEDIA_GUID
>>> + }, {
>>> + EFI_DEV_END_PATH,
>>> + EFI_DEV_END_ENTIRE,
>>> + sizeof(struct efi_generic_dev_path)
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * efi_load_initrd_dev_path - load the initrd from the Linux initrd device path
>>> + * @load_addr: pointer to store the address where the initrd was loaded
>>> + * @load_size: pointer to store the size of the loaded initrd
>>> + * @max: upper limit for the initrd memory allocation
>>> + * @return: %EFI_SUCCESS if the initrd was loaded successfully, in which case
>>> + * @load_addr and @load_size are assigned accordingly
>>> + * %EFI_NOT_FOUND if no LoadFile2 protocol exists on the initrd
>>> + * device path
>>> + * %EFI_LOAD_ERROR in all other cases
>>
>> [*]
>>
>>> + */
>>> +efi_status_t efi_load_initrd_dev_path(unsigned long *load_addr,
>>> + unsigned long *load_size,
>>> + unsigned long max)
>>> +{
>>> + efi_guid_t lf2_proto_guid = EFI_LOAD_FILE2_PROTOCOL_GUID;
>>> + efi_device_path_protocol_t *dp;
>>> + efi_load_file2_protocol_t *lf2;
>>> + unsigned long initrd_addr;
>>> + unsigned long initrd_size;
>>> + efi_handle_t handle;
>>> + efi_status_t status;
>>> +
>>> + if (!load_addr || !load_size)
>>> + return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
>>
>> Doesn't return EFI_LOAD_ERROR.
>>
>>> +
>>> + dp = (efi_device_path_protocol_t *)&initrd_dev_path;
>>> + status = efi_bs_call(locate_device_path, &lf2_proto_guid, &dp, &handle);
>>> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> + return status;
>>
>> Seems safe (the only plausible error could be EFI_NOT_FOUND).
>>
>>> +
>>> + status = efi_bs_call(handle_protocol, handle, &lf2_proto_guid,
>>> + (void **)&lf2);
>>> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> + return status;
>>
>> Interesting case; this should never fail... but note, if it does, it
>> returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED, not EFI_NOT_FOUND (if the protocol is missing
>> from the handle).
>>
>>> +
>>> + status = efi_call_proto(lf2, load_file, dp, false, &initrd_size, NULL);
>>> + if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL)
>>> + return EFI_LOAD_ERROR;
>>> +
>>> + status = efi_allocate_pages(initrd_size, &initrd_addr, max);
>>> + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
>>> + return status;
>>
>> Not sure about the efi_allocate_pages() wrapper (?); the UEFI service
>> could return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES.
>>
>
> Hmm, guess I was a bit sloppy with the return codes. The important
> thing is that EFI_NOT_FOUND is only returned in the one specifically
> defined case.
>
>> Looks OK to me otherwise.
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
>> (... I'm a bit doubtful of passing and End node to LF2 rather than a
>> filepath node with "" for pathname, but it's an LF2 on our own vendor
>> path, so I guess we dictate what we accept.)
>>
>
> It seems to me that the whole point of advancing the
> pointer-to-pointer-to-device path protocol past the matched part of
> the device path is to make it straight-forward for the caller to pass
> the remainder into the protocol implementation. So if the matched part
> fully defines the target, pointing to an end node is the only correct
> thing to do imo, as the empty file did not appear in the device path
> that was used to locate the protocol.

Fair enough.

Thanks
Laszlo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-17 11:02    [W:0.119 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site