lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ASoC: cpcap: Implement set_tdm_slot for voice call support
From
Date
Hi Tony,

On 12/02/2020 16.46, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [200212 09:18]:
>> On 11/02/2020 20.10, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> +static int cpcap_voice_set_tdm_slot(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
>>> + unsigned int tx_mask, unsigned int rx_mask,
>>> + int slots, int slot_width)
>>> +{
>>> + struct snd_soc_component *component = dai->component;
>>> + struct cpcap_audio *cpcap = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
>>> + int err, ts_mask, mask;
>>> + bool voice_call;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Primitive test for voice call, probably needs more checks
>>> + * later on for 16-bit calls detected, Bluetooth headset etc.
>>> + */
>>> + if (tx_mask == 0 && rx_mask == 1 && slot_width == 8)
>>> + voice_call = true;
>>> + else
>>> + voice_call = false;
>>
>> You only have voice call if only rx slot0 is in use?
>
> Yeah so it seems. Then there's the modem to wlcore bluetooth path that
> I have not looked at. But presumably that's again just configuring some
> tdm slot on the PMIC.
>
>> If you record mono on the voice DAI, then rx_mask is also 1, no?
>
> It is above :) But maybe I don't follow what you're asking here

If you arecrod -Dvoice_pcm -c1 -fS8 > /dev/null
then it is reasonable that the machine driver will set rx_mask = 1

> and maybe you have some better check in mind.

Not sure, but relying on set_tdm_slots to decide if we are in a call
case does not sound right.

> I have no idea where we would implement recording voice calls for
> example, I guess mcbsp could do that somewhere to dump out a tdm slot
> specific traffic.

Need to check how things are wired and how they expected to work ;)

>>> +
>>> + ts_mask = 0x7 << CPCAP_BIT_MIC2_TIMESLOT0;
>>> + ts_mask |= 0x7 << CPCAP_BIT_MIC1_RX_TIMESLOT0;
>>> +
>>> + mask = (tx_mask & 0x7) << CPCAP_BIT_MIC2_TIMESLOT0;
>>> + mask |= (rx_mask & 0x7) << CPCAP_BIT_MIC1_RX_TIMESLOT0;
>>> +
>>> + err = regmap_update_bits(cpcap->regmap, CPCAP_REG_CDI,
>>> + ts_mask, mask);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + err = cpcap_set_samprate(cpcap, CPCAP_DAI_VOICE, slot_width * 1000);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>
>> You will also set the sampling rate for voice in
>> cpcap_voice_hw_params(), but that is for normal playback/capture, right?
>
> Yeah so normal playback/capture is already working with cpcap codec driver
> with mainline Linux. The voice call needs to set rate to 8000.

But if you have a voice call initiated should not the rate be set by the
set_sysclk()?


>>> +
>>> + err = cpcap_voice_call(cpcap, dai, voice_call);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>
>> It feels like that these should be done via DAPM with codec to codec route?
>
> Sure if you have some better way of doing it :) Do you have an example to
> point me to?

Something along the lines of:
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2020-February/162915.html

The it is a matter of building and connecting the DAPM routes between
the two codec and with a flip of the switch you would have audio flowing
between them.

>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
>

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-14 14:31    [W:0.056 / U:2.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site